Do you think it is pejorative? I think yes, a friend thinks no.
Opinions?
I know you all have one!
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 10:30 AMI think it definitely depends on the situation -- and the intent with which the word is spoken. I can say to my friends: "Oh, you're such a bitch!!!" -- whereupon they'll reply, "Thank you!!"
let's see what the OED sayeth:
oooh!! Interesting!
Smug [adjective]
the original definition was "A Blacksmith" first incidence in print was during the 17th and 18th centuries.
Then, it was "A hard working University Student" and/or "A self-satisfied person" (19th Centuries, mainly in America)
Most currently, it is "[from the low German *smuk* meaning 'pretty'] Originally: trim, neat, spruce, smart, tidy; (esp. of the face) smooth, sleek. Now, having a self-satisfied, conceited, complacent, or conscientiously respectable air; indicative of or characterized by complacency or self-satisfaction."
it also can be a verb transitive -- whereupon it may mean to "smarten up (oneself, one's appearance, etc.), make neat or spruce. Usually followed by the word "up" -- or verb intransitive: "caress or fondle" (ooh!)
Finally --- an extra rare slang, another verb transitive use: "Steal, filch, run away with."
huh.
That's the LONG ANSWER fulla MORE INFORMATION than you could possibly ever need or want.
Short answer is, in my opinion: it's not exactly the most flattering thing a person could be called, but I don't think it's the worst --- I'd rather be called smug than a mephitic merdivorous prevaricator ---
;)
-
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 12:33 PM
Many thanks for the OED cite! I don't own one, and my "Shorter Oxford" hasn't been unpacked yet.
I had *no* idea of either of the verb forms!
-
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 12:40 PMI've got the Shorter (2 vol.) OED too -- but a friend at school says the OED online is great. I haven't checked it out yet, but I trust her opinion immensely. -
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 12:44 PM
I'm sure it is, but it is also very expensive (if you don't get it through your school or work).
-
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 12:48 PMohhhh ... dang ... I just assumed it was free. Silly, naive ol' me. -
-
Re: the word "smug"
Tue, October 25, 2005 - 4:32 PM
It's $295/year or $29.95/month. Now don't get me wrong, if one used it daily it would probably be worth it, but for a non-writer who only used it once in a while it seems expensive.
See www.oed.com/subscribe/in...als-amer.html
-
-
-
Re: the word "smug"
Sun, October 30, 2005 - 1:10 AMIt would almost be cheaper to take classes at the university year round to be able to use their subscription. Of course, you'd have to access it through the university's network.
I sure got spoiled when I worked for UAA. Who wants to do work when you can browse the OED online?
-
-
-
-
-
-